| | | | | | | | | | Item 3.
COMMITTEE MEMORANDUM | | | |
| | | | | | | | TO: | Sustainability Resiliency Committee Meeting |
|
| FROM:
| Jimmy L. Morales, City Manager
|
|
| DATE: | March 20, 2019
|
|
| SUBJECT: | DISCUSSION ON THE CITYWIDE FLEET ASSESSMENT AND ESTABLISHED POLICIES FOR ENHANCING THE CITY’S FLEET.
|
| |
| | | | | | | | RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT: Jorge Cano, Fleet Management |
| | | | | | | | LEGISLATIVE TRACKING: Item C4 AH – May 16, 2018 Commission Meeting |
| | | | | | | | SPONSORED: Commissioner Michael Gongora l Commissioner Micky Steinberg l Vice-Mayor Joy Malakoff |
| | | | | | | | BACKGROUND:
In 2018, the City contracted with Matrix Consulting Group to assess the City’s vehicle replacement policies, practices, and funding strategy and provide recommendations on a long-term replacement plan. As a follow-up, and in conjunction with the Replacement Study, Matrix was also retained in July of 2018 to conduct a comprehensive vehicle utilization and right-sizing study to identify opportunities to streamline fleet sizes and flag potential surplus vehicles and equipment. This initiative was consistent with on-going citywide efforts to identify opportunities to reduce expenses, increase operating efficiencies and improve productivity.
The utilization study commenced with a general assessment on the number and types of vehicles in the City’s fleet. The scope of the work included a review of available fleet utilization GPS data from the City’s Automatic Vehicle Locator (AVL) system; completion, by departments, of fleet allocation worksheets used to associate vehicles to programs, functions and staff; interviews with departments to discuss their needs for relatively low use vehicles; development of recommendations regarding vehicles that could be eliminated from the fleet without undue negative impacts to city operations; and calculations of potential savings from implementing the study team’s recommendations.
|
| | | | | | | | UPDATE:
Although the utilization of vehicles was found to be generally good, the study identified 18 vehicles that could be eliminated, representing savings of approximately $1,000,000 in avoided replacement costs could be repeatedly avoided in future replacement cycles, as well as annual maintenance and repair savings of approximately $18,000.
| | |
| | | | | | | | CONCLUSION:
The following is presented to the members of the Sustainability and Resiliency Committee as an update.
| | |
|