| | | | | | | | | | City of Miami Beach, 1700 Convention Center Drive, Miami Beach, Florida 33139, www.miamibeachfl.gov
| | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Item 16.
COMMITTEE MEMORANDUM | | | |
| | | | | | | | TO: Land Use and Sustainability Committee
|
| FROM: Alina T. Hudak, City Manager
|
| DATE: March 1, 2023
|
| |
| | | | | | | | TITLE: | DISCUSS OFF-STREET PARKING REGULATIONS FOR DISTRICTS WITH REDUCED PARKING REQUIREMENTS AND DISCUSS POTENTIAL AMENDMENTS TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS TO ENSURE THAT ADEQUATE PARKING REMAINS AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC |
| |
| | | | | | | | HISTORY:
| On November 16, 2022, at the request of Commissioner Alex Fernandez, the City Commission referred the subject discussion (C4 X) to the Land Use and Sustainability Committee (LUSC). The item was placed on the January 25, 2023 LUSC agenda and deferred to the February 15, 2023 LUSC meeting, at the request of the item sponsor. On February 15, 2023 the item was deferred to the March 1, 2023 LUSC meeting, with no discussion.
As noted in the attached referral memo, the item sponsor is requesting that the LUSC review current regulations for parking districts with reduced parking requirements, to ensure that adequate parking remains available for the City’s residents, visitors, and businesses. As part of this discussion, the item sponsor has also requested that the LUSC discuss potential amendments to the Land Development Regulations (LDRs) including, without limitation, the following:
1. Modifications to current off-street parking requirements;
2. Crafting a policy, for the redevelopment of properties with existing off-street parking, to encourage or require that any new development replace the current number of off-street parking spaces provided; and
3. Create a framework, including zoning incentives, for private development to create additional parking for public use.
The item sponsor has also requested that the City Administration advise the LUSC on the need for an updated analysis of current and future parking demands throughout the various districts in the city and develop a parking masterplan for the future. |
|
| | | | | | | | ANALYSIS:
| Modifications to current off-street parking requirements.
As part of a separate referral to the LUSC, made in conjunction with the recently adopted Resiliency Code and LDR updates, planning staff will be working with the Code consultant to fully evaluate the current minimum parking requirements set-forth in the LDR’s. A good portion of the current minimum parking requirements are dated and not consistent with actual off-street parking demand. This is anticipated to be an extensive review, culminating in recommendations for separate amendments to the minimum parking requirements.
Regulations to encourage or require the replacement of existing off-street parking spaces.
Currently, existing properties that contain off-street parking facilities and spaces must retain such spaces, unless a change in use results in a decrease in the number of required parking spaces. Additionally, in certain areas of the City, existing off-street parking spaces may be removed and not replaced subject to the payment of a one-time parking impact fee (currently $40,000 per required space).
In terms of encouraging the retention of existing spaces, this should be looked at very carefully, as some properties have the capacity to store more vehicles on site, while others do not. Also, some properties simply no longer have a need for some, or all of the parking spaces located on site.
Since the City has funds available in the parking impact fee accounts, and collects ongoing mobility fees, further study into potential locations for public garages, or joint ventures with the private sector that include public parking, would make the most sense.
Zoning incentives for private development to create additional parking for public use.
One of the biggest impediments for developers to provide additional parking on site is that any parking not considered required parking counts towards a property's floor area ratio (FAR). To address this, there are two (2) potential options:
1. Adopt an LDR amendment that would provide an FAR exception for non-required parking; this would require voter approval.
2. Increase minimum parking requirements within a given district, to create a parking requirement for public or guest spaces.
Also, code changes to encourage and make it easier for properties with existing, excess parking to be utilized by the public, would be appropriate.
Parking master plan and updated analysis of current and future parking demand.
A scope for the parking master plan has been prepared by the Parking Department. It is anticipated that an Invitation to Quote (ITQ) for a consultant to develop a parking master plan based on this scope will be brought before the City Commission for approval in April 2023. |
|
| | | | | | | | CONCLUSION:
| The Administration recommends that the Land Use and Sustainability Committee discuss the proposal and provide any applicable recommendations to the City Commission. |
| | |
| | | | | | | | Is this a "Residents Right to Know" item, pursuant to City Code Section 2-14? | | Does this item utilize G.O. Bond Funds? | | Yes | | No | |
| | |
| | | | | | | | Strategic Connection
| Mobility - Increase multi-modal mobility citywide and connectivity regionally. |
|
|