| | | | | | | | | Ordinances - R5 T
COMMISSION MEMORANDUM |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | TO: | Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission | | FROM: | Alina T. Hudak, City Manager | | DATE: | January 31, 2024 | | | First Reading
| SUBJECT: | NOTICE REQUIREMENTS FOR DISCUSSION ITEMS
AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE CODE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, SUBPART B, ENTITLED "LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS," BY AMENDING CHAPTER 2 OF THE RESILIENCY CODE, ENTITLED "ADMINISTRATION AND REVIEW PROCEDURES," ARTICLE II, ENTITLED "GENERAL DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION AND HEARING PROCEDURES," SECTION 2.2.4, ENTITLED "PUBLIC HEARING," BY AMENDING SUBSECTION 2.2.4.1, ENTITLED "PUBLIC NOTIFICATION," TO ESTABLISH A NOTICE PROCEDURE FOR CERTAIN DISCUSSION ITEMS THAT ARE SCHEDULED BY LAND USE BOARDS; AND PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION, REPEALER, SEVERABILITY, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | RECOMMENDATION
| The Administration recommends that the City Commission approve the subject ordinance at First Reading and schedule a Second Reading public hearing for April 3, 2024. |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | BACKGROUND/HISTORY
| On November 16, 2022, at the request of former Commissioner Ricky Arriola, the City Commission referred a discussion (Item C4 U) regarding improved notice requirements for property owners to the Land Use and Sustainability Committee (LUSC). On January 25, 2023, the item was continued to the February 15, 2023 LUSC meeting, with no discussion. On February 15, 2023, the LUSC discussed and concluded the item with direction to the Administration to draft an ordinance and recommended that the City Commission refer the ordinance to the Planning Board.
On April 28, 2023, the City Commission referred the item to the Planning Board (Item C4 A). On November 20, 2023, Commissioner Tanya K. Bhatt became the new item sponsor.
A robust public notice and review process currently exists for all applications for development approvals heard by the Design Review Board (DRB), Historic Preservation Board (HPB), Planning Board and Board of Adjustment. The City’s Land Development Regulations set forth the process and minimum notice requirements for all Land Use Board (LUB) applications. Hearings before a LUB on an application for development approval are required to be noticed in accordance with the following provisions:
a. Advertisement. At least 30 days prior to the public hearing date, a description of the request, and the date, start time of the meeting and location of the hearing shall be noticed in a newspaper of general circulation.
b. Mail notice. At least 30 days prior to the public hearing date, a description of the request, and the date, start time of the meeting, and location of the hearing shall be given by mail to the owners of record of land lying within 375 feet of the property subject to the application. Applicants shall submit all information and certifications necessary to meet this requirement, as determined by the Planning Department. Additionally, courtesy notice shall also be given to any Florida not-for-profit community organization which has requested of the Planning Director in writing to be notified of board hearings.
c. Posting. At least 30 days prior to the public hearing date, a description of the request, and the date, time, and place of such hearing shall be posted on the property. Such posting shall be a minimum dimension of 11 inches by 17 inches and located in a visible location at the front of the property and shall not be posted on a fence or wall that would be obstructed by the operation of a gate. |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | ANALYSIS
| Currently, there are no minimum notice requirements for discussion items that may be taken up by the City’s LUB’s (DRB, HPB, Planning Board or Board of Adjustment). Generally, when a member of an LUB requests a particular matter be discussed, the practice has been for the Board to place such discussion on the next available agenda. At that point, the item is added to the City’s online agenda system where it is available to the public.
While not common, there have been instances where a LUB discusses and provides a recommendation on an item that was not on a published agenda and without any type of notice. To increase transparency related to these types of discussion matters, at the request of the LUSC, the Administration has drafted the attached ordinance, which establishes the following minimum notice requirements for LUB discussion items:
1. At least 10 days prior to any discussion item being heard specific to a single property, a courtesy mail or email notice shall be sent to the owner of such property, and the title for such discussion shall be posted on the City’s online agenda system.
2. At least 10 days prior to any discussion item being heard with respect to multiple properties, the title for such discussion shall be posted on the City’s online agenda system.
To avoid conflict with the City’s Charter provision regarding the powers and duties of the HPB, the above provisions are not applicable to HPB discussion items pertaining to the initiation of historic designation. While the Administration will continue to make every attempt to provide advance notice to a property owner, the following additional supplemental notice for HPB matters is included in the ordinance:
1. Within 10 days following an action by the HPB to initiate the historic designation of a single property or a district containing less than 10 properties, a mail or email courtesy notice shall be provided to such property owner(s).
It is important to note that the existing historic designation procedures currently require a minimum of five (5) public notices after the HPB votes to initiate the designation process. The designation of an individual property or an area less than 10 acres includes a mail notice to any affected property owner and all property owners within 375’ prior to HPB review of a preliminary evaluation and prior to the initiation of zoning in progress.
In summary, the proposed enhanced notice provisions for discussion items before the City’s LUBs are expected to increase transparency and provide property owners with pertinent information regarding their individual property.
PLANNING BOARD REVIEW
On June 27, 2023, the Planning Board held a public hearing and transmitted the proposed ordinance to the City Commission with a favorable recommendation (6-0).
APPLICATION FEE WAIVER
The subject amendment is proposed on a comprehensive, citywide basis, and not on behalf of a private applicant or third party. Pursuant to section 2.4.1.c of the Land Development Regulations of the City Code, amendments to the City Code require the payment of the applicable fees in section 2.2.3.5, 2.2.3.6, and appendix A to the City Code. These fees may be waived by a five-sevenths (5/7ths) vote of the City Commission, based upon one or more of the following circumstances:
1. The City Commission determines that the proposed amendment is necessary due to a change in federal or state law, or to implement best practices in urban planning, or based on circumstances unique to the proposed amendment.
2. Upon the written recommendation of the City Manager acknowledging a documented financial hardship of a property owner(s) or developer(s).
3. If requested, in writing, by a non-profit organization, neighborhood association, or homeowner's association for property owned by any such organization or association, so long as the request demonstrates that a public purpose is achieved by enacting the applicable amendment.
The Administration recommends that the City Commission determine that the proposed amendment is necessary to implement best practices in urban planning and waive the applicable fees.
BUSINESS IMPACT ESTIMATE
In accordance with Section 166.041(4), Florida Statutes, the City of Miami Beach is required to assess whether a Business Impact Estimate is required for the subject ordinance. As noted in the attached and published on the City's website on January 11, 2024, a Business Impact Estimate is not required for the subject ordinance as it implements an amendment to the Land Development Regulations.
LOBBYIST DISCLOSURE
In accordance with Resolution No. 2023-32857, adopted by the City Commission on December 13, 2023, the following information has been provided by the primary item sponsor as it relates to the subject ordinance amendment:
1. Was the Agenda Item initially requested by a lobbyist which, as defined in Code Sec. 2-481, includes a principal engaged in lobbying? No
2. If so, specify name of lobbyist(s) and principal(s): Not Applicable |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | SUPPORTING SURVEY DATA
| According to the Miami Beach 2022 Community Satisfaction Survey, between 2019 and 2022, the percentage of respondents who perceive the City as open and interested in hearing the concerns or issues of residents fell from 56.4% to 49%. Establishing a notice procedure for certain discussion items that are scheduled by Land Use Boards will increase transparency and engagement. |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | FINANCIAL INFORMATION
| No Fiscal Impact Expected |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | CONCLUSION
| The Administration recommends the following:
1. In accordance with section 2.4.1.c.1 of the Land Development Regulations of the City Code, the City Commission waive the applicable fees based upon the legislation implementing best practices in urban planning.
2. The City Commission approve the subject ordinance at First Reading and schedule a Second Reading public hearing for April 3, 2024. |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | Is this a "Residents Right to Know" item, pursuant to City Code Section 2-14? | | Does this item utilize G.O. Bond Funds? | | Yes | | No | |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | Legislative Tracking Planning |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | Sponsor Commissioner Tanya K. Bhatt and Co-sponsored by Commissioner Joseph Magazine |
| | | |
|