Item Coversheet

Committee Assignments - C4  H




COMMISSION MEMORANDUM

TO:Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission 
FROM:Jimmy L. Morales, City Manager 
DATE:December  11, 2019
 



SUBJECT:REFERRAL TO THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD AND THE PLANNING BOARD - ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 118-503 OF THE CITY CODE TO CREATE A PRESUMPTION FOR THE RECONSTRUCTION OF DEMOLISHED CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURES.

RECOMMENDATION

The administration recommends that the City Commission refer the attached ordinance to the Historic Preservation Board and Planning Board for review and recommendation.

BACKGROUND/HISTORY

On July 17, 2019, at the request of Commissioner Ricky Arriola, the City Commission referred a discussion item to the Land Use and Development Committee (Item C4 O), pertaining to the establishment of penalties for property owners engaging in demolition by neglect. The item was discussed at the October 30, 2019 meeting, and the Land Use Committee recommended that the City Commission refer an amendment to chapter 118, article X, pertaining to a presumption clause, to the Planning Board.

ANALYSIS

PLANNING AND LEGAL ANALYSIS

Attached is a proposed amendment to chapter 118, Article X of the LDR’s, which creates a presumption clause if a contributing structure is demolished, for any reason, including, but not limited to demolition by neglect. The following is the specific draft amendment to section 118-503:

 

Sec. 118-503. - Scope, policies and exemptions.

 

                  *                                               *                                   *

(b) Policies.

(1) After-the-fact certificates of appropriateness for demolition. In the event any demolition as described above or in subsection (b) of this section should take place prior to historic preservation board review, the demolition order shall be conditioned to require the property owner to file an "after-the-fact" application for a certificate of appropriateness for demolition to the historic preservation board, within 15 days of the issuance of the demolition order. No "after-the-fact" fee shall be assessed for such application. The board shall review the demolition and determine whether and how the demolished building, structure, landscape feature or the partially or fully demolished feature of the exterior or public interior space of a structure, shall be replaced. The property owner shall also be required, to the greatest extent possible, to retain, preserve and restore any demolished feature of a structure until such time as the board reviews and acts on the "after-the-fact" application. In the event the property owner fails to file an "after-the-fact" application for a certificate of appropriateness for demolition to the historic preservation board within 15 days of the issuance of an emergency demolition order, the city may initiate enforcement proceedings including proceedings to revoke the certificate of use, occupational license, any active building permit(s) or certificate of occupancy of the subject site, whichever is appropriate. Additionally, this article may be enforced and violations may be punished as provided in section 114-8 of this Code; or by enforcement procedures as set forth in the Charter and penalties as provided in section 1-14 of this Code.

(2) Replacement of existing structures. The policy of the City of Miami Beach shall be a presumption that a contributing building demolished without obtaining a certificate of appropriateness from the historic preservation board, shall only be replaced with a new structure that incorporates the same height, massing and square footage of the previous structure on site, not to exceed the FAR of the demolished structure, and not to exceed the maximum FAR and height permitted under the City Code, with no additional square footage added. This policy presumption shall be applicable in the event a building permit for new construction or for repair or rehabilitation is issued, and demolition occurs for any reason, including, but not limited to, an order of the building official or the county unsafe structures board. This policy presumption shall also be applicable to any request for an "after-the-fact" certificate of appropriateness. This policy presumption may be rebutted, and the historic preservation board may allow for the addition of more square footage, where appropriate, not to exceed the maximum permitted under the City Code, if it is established to the satisfaction of the historic preservation board that the following criteria have been satisfied:

a. The proposed new structure is consistent with the context and character of the immediate area; and

b. The property owner made a reasonable effort to regularly inspect and maintain the structure free of structural deficiencies and in compliance with the minimum maintenance standards of this Code.

(3) Replication of demolished contributing structures. The historic preservation board shall determine, on a case-by-case basis, whether the replication of an original, contributing structure is warranted. For purposes of this subsection, replication shall be defined as the physical reconstruction, including all original dimensions in the original location, of a structure in totality, inclusive of the reproduction of primary facade dimensions and public area dimensions with appropriate historic materials whenever possible, original walls, window and door openings, exterior features and finishes, floor slab, floor plates, roofs and public interior spaces. The historic preservation board shall have full discretion as to the exact level of demolition and reconstruction required. If a building to be reconstructed is nonconforming, any such reconstruction shall comply with all of the requirements of chapter 118, article IX, of these land development regulations.

 

On October 30, 2019, the LUDC recommended that the City Commission refer the proposed amendment to the Planning Board. Pursuant to section 118-102 of the City Code, the historic preservation board is authorized to review any and all amendments to the Code affecting historic preservation issues.

CONCLUSION

Pursuant to the recommendation of the Land Use and Developemnt Committee, the Administration recommends that the City Commission refer the attached ordinance amendment to the Historic Preservation Baord and Planning Board for review and recommendation.

Applicable Area

Citywide
Is this a Resident Right to Know item? Does this item utilize G.O. Bond Funds?
Yes No 
Legislative Tracking
Planning
Sponsor
Commissioner Ricky Arriola and Co-sponsored by Commissioner Gongora

ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Draft Ref ORD